Yes, you REALLY can buy a home atfer losing your home in a short sale, foreclosure or having declared bankruptcy. The following is an article that I wrote for DeadlineNews.com and is featured on the mega real estate news site, RealtyTimes.com.
Yes, you REALLY can buy a home atfer losing your home in a short sale, foreclosure or having declared bankruptcy. The following is an article that I wrote for DeadlineNews.com and is featured on the mega real estate news site, RealtyTimes.com.
Posted by Robert Aldana on 02/08/2012 at 01:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Despite laws that have been put into place in California which prohibits the collection of Advanced Fees for loan modification services by real estate agents, their offices and attorneys, they continue to collect Advanced Fees.
Posted by Robert Aldana on 01/12/2012 at 09:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
All good things must come to an end, right? 2012 is the year of countless predictions of our world as we know it coming to an end. But here's one fact of a good thing coming to an end - The End of The Mortgage Debt Relief Act (MDRA) which forgives your loss in a short sale or foreclosure from being taxable income. Without it, you could owe tens of thousands of dollars. In fact, the Sacramento Bee just came out with an article that confirms what I have been saying since last year, time to fish or cut bait.
Posted by Robert Aldana on 01/10/2012 at 10:11 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Q: Robert, I am in the middle of doing a short sale and I was told that there is a Government program that offers you $30,000 for SS assistance. Is this true? And if so, how can I apply for this? - Sara in Las Vegas, Nev.
A: Sara, many lenders are offering what is either called “cash for keys”, where they give you up to $3,000 for you to move out of your home when it has been sold via either a short sale or through a trustee sale. There is also another program called the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives, known as HAFA, that is Government sponsored where they will give you $3,000 for relocation assistance at the closing of a short sale transaction. The HAFA program is a great program to qualify for because not only does it give you the $3,000 assistance, but also any lender participating in and approving a HAFA short sale cannot come after the seller for the difference in the sales price and existing loan amount(s). In California that is a mute point because new legislation, specifically SB94 and SB458 makes it unlawful for lenders to come after a seller for the deficiency after a short sale regardless of whether it is a recourse or non-recourse loan. Like anything else, certain rules and restrictions apply.
The $30,000 that you are talking about is being offered by a very few select lenders. Combined with the $3,000 HAFA relocation incentive, you could walk away with a grand total of $33,000 to do a short sale, no small change. But it is a select few, so select that I know of only one lender who has offered and granted it on a short sale, Chase. I have heard rumblings of other lenders doing it, but so far I have seen one lender actually do this. You should also know that not all Chase short sales will offer the $30,000 incentive and it has to be offered to you by the individual Chase investor who holds the note on your loan. It is not something that you can ask for or demand, there is no magic contacts that anyone would have. Basically the way it works is that if you are qualified for this type of grant and assistance, you will be notified. Kind of like that old saying, “Don’t call me, I’ll call you!”
***Have a real estate or finance question? Send it to robert@robertaldana.com
Posted by Robert Aldana on 10/23/2011 at 08:33 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Q: Hi Robert, I am looking to rent a home in the Willow Glen neighborhood of San Jose, CA. On Zillow and Trulia, where I search for homes, I see homes listed for rent that are lower in monthly payments than others in the same area. The descriptions say, “Take over payments, rent for six months to two years and get the deed in your name.” Are these rent-to-own homes legit? - Carolina in San Jose, CA.
A: Carolina, you are probably referring to a “lease with the option to buy” or simply, “lease option.” It is one of a host of home-buying alternatives sellers are offering as an opportunity for those who can’t get a home loan because they have credit problems or don’t otherwise meet underwriting guidelines.
These alternatives can open the door to homeownership, but they can also be risky ventures that set you back.
Let’s take a look at your options.
Lease option – The best lease options benefit both the seller and the buyer. The seller typically wants to keep up on mortgage payments until the home appreciates sufficiently and can be sold for a profit or break even amount. The buyer is often cash-rich but savings-poor and wants a alternative way to put a roof over his or her head.
The seller and buyer contract to allow the buyer to move in and lease the property for a predetermined rent, term and selling price. At the end of the term, the buyer can exercise the option to buy the property — or not. Typically, a small portion of the rent goes toward the down-payment and/or closing costs, the larger amount continues to help pay the sellers’ mortgage.
If the buyer decides not to or can’t exercise the option to buy, all monies paid to the owner — including the amounts set aside for the down payment — are forfeited to the seller. Much must be negotiated upfront so that there are no misunderstandings.
Setting the price today for a sale in the future can be tricky. The price should be comparable with or lower than what the buyer would expect to pay for a similar home at the time he or she is ready to exercise the option to buy. At the same time, the seller doesn’t want to take a loss and will likely want to set the price as high as possible.
Locking in any price today, in a market that could experience another dip in real estate prices, could leave the buyer with the short end of the deal. Home prices today may not appreciate much if at all in the next few years. You may instead want to wait a little longer, clean up your credit, save money and put yourself in a position to buy outright in a few years.
If prices do rise, the seller may lose some profit and the buyer will win, but either way, its a gamble.
Land Contract of Sale – In this transaction, the seller retains title but records the contract so that the parties cannot sell the property without the buyer’s consent. The buyer usually makes the payments directly to the seller and the seller, in turn, makes the payment to the lender if there is still an outstanding loan or loan(s) on the property.
Subject To – This may be one of the easiest alternatives, but it is not necessarily the best alternative. With this type of transaction, a property owner transfers title to the new buyer and records the change with the county recorder’s office for minor transfer costs. After the transfer, property rights belong to the buyer. Keep in mind, the existing lender or lenders also have a claim on the property.
As a buyer, taking title “subject to” can also mean you are assuming a bad debt if the property is worth a lot less then the mortgage amount. You’ll also assume any delinquent tax bills and other liens on the property.
There are also dangers for the seller. Even though the seller transferred the title, the seller remains liable for the mortgage. If the buyer misses a payment, the lender won’t go after the title holder. The lender will go after the seller and the seller’s credit report will suffer. If the title holder misses payments throughout the life of the loan, that’s how long the seller’s credit will suffer.
Loan Assumption – With a loan assumption, the buyer assumes the loan and the seller is usually relieved of his or her liability to the lender for the remaining balance because there is now a new buyer/owner on the loan.
Be aware, loans typically have a “due on sale clause” or “acceleration clause” that allows the lender to make the loan immediately due in full if the seller transfers the title without the lender’s consent. A transfer without the lender’s consent could trigger a foreclosure.
And not all loans are assumable. Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Veterans Administration loans, and a few adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) are, but you typically can’t assume any of them without qualifying for the mortgage, just as you would apply for a mortgage the conventional way.
Sellers should avoid both “subject to” and mortgage assumption alternatives unless the buyer can fully qualify for the existing mortgage and guarantee you in writing that you will be relieved of any future liability on the mortgage.
Bottom line
In today’s market, buyers shouldn’t consider these alternatives if the seller is “underwater” — holding a mortgage that is greater than the home’s value.
If the mortgage is equal to or less than the value of the home, a lease option or land contract could be good options.
However, buyers are better off renting until they are fully qualified to buy their own home at current or near future prices and interest rates.
Little price and interest rate movement is expected in the near future. There’s no need to rush into a home using potentially risky alternatives.
***Have a real estate or finance question? Send it to robert@robertaldana.com.
Posted by Robert Aldana on 10/23/2011 at 08:22 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I have been discusing whether it is a good time to buy or not in today's real estate market. For the past three years I said it was not a good time to buy because we have not bottomed out yet and we had no idea when we would be at the bottom of the market.
Continue reading "Good Time to Buy? Yes and No... Read On" »
Posted by Robert Aldana on 07/21/2011 at 10:41 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Silicon Valley - San Jose Business Journal reported yesterday that San Francisco based Wells Fargo just announced a record profit in the second quarter of 2011. Good for them, I mean it. They have been one of the more active and responsible lenders in regards to short sales, but still are lacking much needed help with trained staff.
Imagine a more efficient process at Wells Fargo with more people assisting in the short sale process. It would have a tremendous effect on the successful closing of short sales versus the costly effects that foreclosures have on everyone from communities, the economy and the industry. Foreclosures hurt everyone. They drop values and investors are losing billions of dollars.
Hey Wells Fargo; Let's reinvest some of those "record" profits into more help which will in turn give you another record quarter!
Posted by Robert Aldana on 07/20/2011 at 11:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
A recent article came out declaring San Jose - Sunnyvale - Santa Clara area as being the number one city in the country in regards to current and future rising values. According the MSN, the area is predicted to rise 4% in value over the next 12 months and will steadily keep rising.
The article cites increased jobs as being the main factor on this analysis. It stands to reason because more jobs mean more housing demand.
Time will tell if this is a true forecast of course as we have been hearing this type of news for a couple of years now only to see an increase of foreclosures and further job losses. But I can honestly say that we do seem to be close to the bottom of the market. And when you see the bottom of the market, it has nowhere to go but up. But you won't know unfortunately until they rebound.
Rates just came down again yesterday and I am seeing people buy homes with minimal down-payments and fixed rate payments for 30 years that are lower than paying rent. That's gotta be a good sign!
Posted by Robert Aldana on 07/20/2011 at 10:39 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/09/2011 at 07:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/08/2011 at 05:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/07/2011 at 03:45 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/07/2011 at 03:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/07/2011 at 03:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/07/2011 at 03:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/06/2011 at 09:19 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Another great and right-on-the-money article was just released on ERate by award winning writer, Broderick Perkins on how investors are moving to the front of the line and paying cash for homes.
Great Article. This is exactly what is happening. I guess money talks, huh?
I do think however that something needs to be established where lenders can sell only a certain percentage of homes to non-owner occupied buyers to preserve some of the "opportunities" for hard working first-time buyers. For example, make it a rule that 25% of inventory can be sold to investors. It would and could work, and SHOULD work because investors are buying many of these properties at a discount because they have cash and lenders, being the greedy lenders that they are, don't care about the families wanting to buy and what it eventually does is hurt property values by lower prices and more rental properties.
Hey, I'm just sayin'...
Posted by Robert Aldana on 06/02/2011 at 10:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Treasury Department has just released a new online HAMP Evaluator/Calculator tool called CheckMyNPV.com to help people determine why they may have been denied for a HAMP loan modification.
The online evaluation tool is confusing and asks questions that 99% of homeowners do not know such as if their loan is a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loan. Overall it is a clumsy tool that is too complicated for most and is just as confusing as the loan modification process itself.
It is no wonder that the loan modification process continues to be a thorn in the side of the housing market. The apple really does not fall too far from the tree.
Posted by Robert Aldana on 05/31/2011 at 09:07 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The California AG has formed a 25 person strike force to go after mortgage and mortgage foreclosure rescue fraud. Let's hope that this has some teeth and is not another public relations act because the communities who are continued to be affected by this crisis which happens to be ALL COMUNITIES, really need someone to take action against the people and companies who continue to defraud homeowners. Lenders should be on top of this list!
Posted by Robert Aldana on 05/24/2011 at 10:59 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
In what is clearly a public relations move, President Obama (whom I am a fan of actually) put together a town hall meeting to talk to lenders about doing more loan modifications. Excuse me while I yaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwnnnnnnnn...
Haven't we heard this before? In fact; years later you are still begging the crooks called the lending industry to do more? Mr. President, please, you are embarrassing yourself. You, me and all of America knows lenders have no intentions of helping people. By the way, why aren't some of these crooks in jail?
Click here to read the story on DSNews. And please pass the extra strong coffee...
Posted by Robert Aldana on 05/15/2011 at 08:11 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
According to DSNews, more people who are upside-down on their homes are open to and considering strategic default. Meaning, because they owe a lot more on their homes than what they are worth, they are realizing that they may not see the light at the end of the tunnel for possibly decades.
Posted by Robert Aldana on 05/15/2011 at 08:04 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Recent Comments